LDS Audit

Chad Daybell gives a "patriarchal blessing"

Chad Daybell's "Patriarchal Blessing": When Unauthorized Religious Authority Shapes Criminal Evidence

The trial of Chad Daybell has surfaced a striking piece of evidence that raises uncomfortable questions about religious authority, manipulation, and the line between spiritual counsel and criminal intent. During proceedings, prosecutors presented a "patriarchal blessing" that Daybell gave to Alex Cox, the brother of Lori Vallow Daybell, in which Daybell assumed the role of patriarch and pronounced Alex's divine purpose, including language suggesting Alex would "save" his sister. The problem is simple but profound: Chad Daybell held no official ecclesiastical authorization to give such a blessing. Yet according to reporting from the Mormon Stories Podcast, the blessing carried the unmistakable cadence and authority of legitimate LDS religious practice. This discrepancy between form and legitimacy cuts to the heart of how charismatic figures exploit religious framework to consolidate power and influence vulnerable people.

For those unfamiliar with LDS theology, a patriarchal blessing is a formal religious ordinance given only by ordained patriarchs, men formally set apart by the Church hierarchy to pronounce blessings upon members. These blessings are understood as spiritually binding declarations of divine purpose, lineage, and life direction. They carry genuine weight in the spiritual lives of believing Latter-day Saints. When an unauthorized person assumes this role, they are not simply giving encouragement; they are counterfeiting sacred authority.

The Unauthorized Blessing and Its Context

According to the Mormon Stories Podcast investigation, Daybell's blessing to Alex Cox contained language designed to reinforce a specific narrative: that Alex had a sacred duty to protect his sister (Lori) and that he would play a saving role in her life. This framing would later prove significant as the investigation into the deaths of Lori's children progressed.

The blessing itself is notable not for its theological content but for its rhetorical structure. Daybell adopted the measured, reverent tone characteristic of official patriarchal blessings. He used language familiar to LDS members, references to divine will, spiritual protection, and predetermined purpose. To someone steeped in Church culture, the blessing would sound authentic, even authoritative.