D&C 132 - Joseph Smith's Polygamy "Revelation" | Ep. 1676 | LDS Discussions Ep. 25

D&C 132: The Controversial Revelation on Polygamy

When it comes to Mormon doctrine, few sections of scripture spark as much debate as Doctrine and Covenants Section 132. This controversial revelation, attributed to Joseph Smith, introduced the practice of polygamy into early Mormonism. For some, it's a question of divine communication. For others, it's a troubling footnote in religious history. But why does D&C 132 matter so much today? It challenges our understanding of prophetic authority and raises important questions about the origins of religious beliefs.

The Historical Context of D&C 132

In the mid-19th century, Joseph Smith, the founder of the Latter-day Saint movement, presented D&C 132 as a revelation from God. It was during a time when Smith faced both internal and external pressures. Internally, his secret practice of polygamy was causing unrest among followers, including his wife, Emma Smith. Externally, the broader American society saw polygamy as both an exotic and illegal practice. According to research discussed in the Mormon Stories Podcast, Smith claimed that he sought divine guidance after pondering the Old Testament's references to polygamy. The revelation thus served as a divine justification for a practice that was already well underway in Smith's private life.

Key Claims and Documentary Evidence

The claims contained within D&C 132 are as fascinating as they are jarring. This revelation not only purported to command the practice of polygamy but also drew parallels with biblical figures like Abraham and David. Critics argue that these justifications were a convenient means to legitimate Joseph Smith's existing practices. As noted in the Mormon Stories Podcast, Smith was already engaged in polygamous relationships before this revelation was shared with his followers. The document also contains passages that can be interpreted as coercive, particularly its directives toward Emma Smith, which some say reveal a personal rather than divine motivation. The idea that God would threaten Emma with destruction if she did not accept polygamy stands out as one of the most controversial aspects of this text.