LDS Audit

Family Feud & Scandal in Early Mormonism - John Turner Pt. 18 | Ep. 2072

The prophet and the apostle took off their coats and threw punches in the dirt. This was not a frontier brawl between strangers, but a fistfight between Joseph Smith and his younger brother William in Kirtland, Ohio, during the fall of 1835. The immediate cause was a dispute over a debate society meeting, but the real fuel came from a family feud over what John Turner, in his biography Joseph Smith: The Rise and Fall of an American Prophet, identifies as the first known child abuse scandal in early Mormonism. The episode, examined in detail on the Mormon Stories Podcast, reveals how power, loyalty, and blood relations collided when the church was still inventing its organizational structure.

Background: Nepotism and New Authorities

By 1835, Joseph Smith was still figuring out how to govern his growing movement. The church had recently organized the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, and Joseph had appointed his brother William to serve despite William's "inflammatory disposition," as Joseph later admitted. To secular observers this looks like straightforward nepotism. To believers, it is divine preference for trusted kin. Either way, the arrangement created tension. William felt empowered by his calling, while Joseph struggled to define exactly what authority the Twelve held compared to other leadership bodies in Kirtland.

The church was also fielding missionaries and managing refugees from Missouri, where saints were being driven from their homes. Into this volatile environment walked the Elliott family. David Elliott was a loyal follower who had received a patriarchal blessing earlier that year proclaiming he would be an instrument in God's hands. When accusations surfaced that Elliott had whipped his daughter Lucina severely, Joseph had every personal reason to protect his ally.

The 1835 Child Abuse Scandal

In late October 1835, William Smith brought charges against David Elliott and his wife before the Kirtland High Council. According to Turner’s research, presented in his interview with John Dehlin on Morman Stories, the council initially delivered a verdict that shocks modern sensibilities. They determined that Lucina was "in the fault" and received only a mild rebuke for her father. The council blamed the child for her own beating.