LDS Audit

A Call for Mormon Church Leadership to Condemn the 1/6/2021 Insurrection and its Supporters

Introduction: The Urgency of Accountability

The events of January 6, 2021, marked a pivotal moment in American history, as a mob attacked the U.S. Capitol in an insurrection attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election. This shocking breach of democracy raised questions across the nation, not only about political accountability but also about the ethical responsibilities of religious organizations. Surprisingly, amid this turmoil, the leadership of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) has remained silent, leaving many of its members and the broader public seeking clarity and moral leadership.

Background: The LDS Church's Historical Stance

Throughout its history, the LDS Church has played a significant role in shaping the moral framework of its followers. With teachings emphasizing peace, honesty, and adherence to the rule of law, members look to the church not just for spiritual guidance but also for moral clarity on critical societal issues. The church's historical engagement in political discourse has primarily revolved around advocating for religious freedom and humanitarian causes. However, its response (or lack thereof) to politically charged events such as the January 6 insurrection raises critical concerns about its present stance.

Key Claims and Evidence: The Deafening Silence

As Dr. John Dulin, host of the Mormon Stories Podcast, expressed in the immediate aftermath of the insurrection, the silence from LDS Church leaders was notable. For an organization with considerable influence over its followers' ethical compass, this absence of condemnation appears inconsistent with its core teachings. Many expected a clear denouncement, not just of the violence, but also of the dangerous rhetoric that led to such unrest. Silence on Political Division: The leadership's silence on the divisive rhetoric associated with former President Donald Trump contrasts with its historical focus on unity and peace. This omission raises questions about whether these ideals stand as unwavering principles or if they depend on the political climate. Expectations of Moral Leadership: Faithful members like Dr. Dulin, who have invested their lives into the church, continue to anticipate statements that align with the church's professed values. The absence of a stance against the events of January 6th might suggest an underlying reluctance to enga