The Solomon Spaulding Theory of the Book of Mormon with Bryce Blankenagel Pt. 2 | Ep. 1105

Understanding the Solomon Spaulding Theory: A Controversial Chapter in Mormon History

The origins of the Book of Mormon have been a subject of intense debate and scrutiny since its publication in 1830. Among the numerous theories surrounding its authorship, the Solomon Spaulding theory is perhaps the most contentious. This theory suggests that a manuscript called "Manuscript Found," written by Solomon Spaulding, played a significant role in shaping the Book of Mormon. Given the profound implications for the authenticity of Mormon scripture, understanding the evidence and arguments in this debate is crucial for anyone exploring the roots of the LDS faith.

Background: A Tale of Two Manuscripts

In the early 19th century, Solomon Spaulding, a former clergyman, penned a manuscript inspired by Native American mound-building cultures. This unfinished work, known as "Manuscript Found," tells the fictional story of a Roman ship sailing to the Americas and recounting adventures that included separated factions and epic battles. Spaulding's friends and family later claimed that this manuscript bore striking similarities to the Book of Mormon, leading them to believe that Joseph Smith, along with associates like Sidney Rigdon, possibly used it as a foundation for LDS scripture.

The theory gained traction when Spaulding's manuscript was said to be in the possession of a local publisher, Eber D. Howe, who published "Mormonism Unvailed" in 1834. Howe's work suggested that Rigdon had access to Spaulding's story and used it to construct sections of the Book of Mormon. This connection has been a topic of debate, with the assertion that Rigdon might have had the manuscript before Joseph Smith ever published the Book of Mormon.

Key Claims and Evidence: Weighing the Arguments